mechanical properties

An explicit model to extract viscoelastic properties of cells from AFM force-indentation curves

The viscoelastic behavior of soft materials, especially cells and tissues, has been extensively investigated due to its importance in many biological and physiological processes that take place during development and even disease.*
Many techniques are used to quantify the mechanical properties of cells, among them micropipette aspiration, optical stretching, deformability cytometry and atomic force microscopy (AFM).*

The AFM, in particular, is still nowadays one of the most popular methods due to its conformity with various material types and geometries and the rather simple analysis process of the material properties.*

For a typical AFM indentation measurement, an AFM cantilever, with a distinct AFM tip shape, moves toward the sample with a predefined velocity and indents it until a prescribed force is reached. The AFM cantilever then moves upwards while detaching from the sample. The deflection and displacement signals of the AFM cantilever are processed further to extract the mechanical properties of the sample. Generally, a Hertzian model is fitted to the approach part of the force-indentation curves to quantify the apparent Young’s modulus.*

When applying the Hertzian model, few assumptions need to be considered, such as the material being homogeneous, isotropic, and linearly elastic. *

Cells and tissues, however, show not only elastic but also viscous behavior that is evident from the hysteresis between the approach and retraction segments of the force-indentation curve. Consequently, assessing this viscoelastic behavior is imperative for understanding the complex nature of biological matter.*

A number of studies utilized AFM to measure the viscoelastic properties of cells in both time and frequency domains.*

Ideally, to investigate the whole range of the viscoelastic behavior one needs to probe the material for a long time and observe its response or apply oscillatory signals and evaluate its phase lag. These approaches require the user to alter the probing method and add several steps to account for the time-dependent drift or the effect of the hydrodynamic drag of the surrounding medium. On top of that, in many of studies, the biological materials were probed with a linear approach followed by immediate retraction. The force-indentation curves from these studies were used to evaluate the apparent elastic modulus of the probed material using the standard Hertzian model. However, additional information concerning energy dissipation can still be extracted from the same curves to evaluate the viscoelasticity of the material.*

In the article “An explicit model to extract viscoelastic properties of cells from AFM force-indentation curves”, Shada Abuhattum, Dominic Mokbel, Paul Müller, Despina Soteriou, Jochen Guck and Sebastian Aland propose a new fitting model to extract the viscoelastic properties of soft materials from AFM force-indentation curves. *

To construct the explicit relation of force and indentation, the authors first use a generalization of Maxwell and Kelvin-Voigt models to describe soft materials, and numerically simulate the indentation of such material with a spherical indenter. *

Shada Abuhattum et al. show that the proposed Kelvin-Voigt-Maxwell (KVM) model adequately captures the force-indentation curves of materials having different mechanical characteristics. *

Based on the simulation results, Shada Abuhattum et al. further propose an explicit force-indentation relation to be fitted to the force-indentation curves. This explicit relation simplifies the association of the mechanical properties with physically meaningful components and processes.
Finally, the authors apply the fitting model to a number of samples, including poroelastic and viscoelastic hydrogels as well as HeLa cells in two different cell cycle phases, interphase and mitotic. *

Shada Abuhattum et al. demonstrate that the distinct nature of the hydrogels, arising from the different crosslinking mechanisms, can be described with the fitting model. For the HeLa cells, the mitotic cells had a higher apparent elasticity and a lower apparent viscosity, implying a stiffer actin cortex and a diluted cytoplasm protein concentration, when compared with interphase cells.*

Their findings demonstrate that the proposed model can reliably extract viscoelastic properties from conventional force-indentation curves. Moreover, the model is able to assess the contribution of the different elastic and viscous elements, and thus allows a direct comparison between the viscoelastic nature of different materials.*

AFM measurements were preformed using a commercially available Atomic Force Microscope. To indent the samples, NanoWorld Pyrex-Nitride tipless AFM cantilevers PNP-TR-TL with a nominal spring constant of 0.08 mN/m were modified by gluing 5 μm diameter polystyrene beads to the underside of the AFM cantilevers using two component glue.*

The AFM cantilevers were calibrated prior to each experiment using the thermal noise method and their accurate spring constant ranged between 0.047-0.059 mN/m. For PAAm and agarose hydrogels, the AFM cantilever was lowered with a constant velocity (5, 10, or 15 μm/s) toward the surface of the sample until a force of 2 nN for agarose and 4 nN for PAAm was reached. These force set points accounted for an indentation in the range of 0.5–1 μm. For HeLa cells, the AFM cantilever was lowered with a constant velocity of 2 μm/s and the cells were indented until a force of 2 nN was reached, which accounted for an indentation depth in the range of 0.5–1.5 μm.*

Graphical abstract for the article “An explicit model to extract viscoelastic properties of cells from AFM force-indentation curves” by Shada Abuhattum, Dominic Mokbel, Paul Müller, Despina Soteriou, Jochen Guck and Sebastian Aland consisting of 4 squares. showing a symbol for numerical simulations in the top left square, an arrow points to the bottom left square showing a graph and a formula as symbols for fitting algorithm a further arrow points to the bottom right square symbolizing the extraction of viscoelastic properties. The pictures in this square show on the left a drawing of the end of a tipless AFM cantilever on which a sphere is glued pressing on a cell, on the right of this picture there is another picture showing the end of a tipless AFM cantilever on which a sphere is glued pressing on a sphere or bead, underneath a graph symbolizing the mechanical properties of hydrogels is shown. Above this square on the top right a graph with a symbol for the mechanical behavior of the indented material is shown.NanoWorld Pyrex-Nitride tipless AFM cantilevers PNP-TR-TL with a nominal spring constant of 0.08 mN/m were modified by gluing 5 μm diameter polystyrene beads to the underside of the AFM cantilevers using two component glue were used for the atomic force microscopy indentation measurements described in the cited article. — Graphical abstract for the article “An explicit model to extract viscoelastic properties of cells from AFM force-indentation curves” by Shada Abuhattum at al. 2022. NanoWorld Pyrex-Nitride tipless AFM cantilevers PNP-TR-TL with a nominal spring constant of 0.08 mN/m were modified by gluing 5 μm diameter polystyrene beads to the underside of the AFM cantilevers using two component glue were used for the atomic force microscopy indentation measurements described in the cited article.

*Shada Abuhattum, Dominic Mokbel, Paul Müller, Despina Soteriou, Jochen Guck and Sebastian Aland
An explicit model to extract viscoelastic properties of cells from AFM force-indentation curves
iScience, Volume 25, ISSUE 4, 104016, April 15, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104016

The article “An explicit model to extract viscoelastic properties of cells from AFM force-indentation curves” by Shada Abuhattum, Dominic Mokbel, Paul Müller, Despina Soteriou, Jochen Guck and Sebastian Aland is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

A beginner’s guide to the Characterization of Hydrogel Microarchitecture for Cellular Applications

Hydrogel materials show a number of properties which make them interesting candidates to be utilized to mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM). Therefore, these materials are attractive for use in biological applications such as tissue engineering, cell culture 3D bioprinting and more.

Are you planning to use hydrogels for the first time in your research?

Then have a look at the insightful article “A beginner’s guide to the Characterization of Hydrogel Microarchitecture for Cellular Applications” by Francisco Drusso Martinez-Garcia, Tony Fischer, Alexander Hayn, Claudia Tanja Mierke, Janette Kay Burgess and Martin Conrad Harmsen.

In their article the authors describe and evaluate the different technologies that are most commonly used to assess hydrogel microarchitecture.

Francisco Drusso Martinez-Garcia et al. explain the working principle of the various methods and also discuss the merits and limitations of each of them in view of their usefulness for the characterization of hydrogels.

They introduce and explore the pros and cons of the following methods: Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Cryogenic Scanning Electron Microscopy (Cryo-SEM), Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM), Micro-Computed Tomography (µ-CT), Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM), Second Harmonic Generation and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM).*

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) can be used to investigate the hydrogel surface topology as well as a hydrogel’s mechanical properties. The latter can be achieved through mathematical modelling of force-distance curves.

When using the AFM to characterize the elasticity of a hydrogel sample it is essential to take the stiffness of the investigated material into account when choosing what kind of AFM probe to use for these experiments.

If an AFM cantilever used for probing a soft sample is too stiff (if the force constant/spring constant is too high) this might result in a poor signal-to-noise ratio.

If a soft AFM probe (an AFM probe with an AFM cantilever with a low force constant) is chosen to investigate a soft material this should lead to a better signal-to-noise ratio. On the other hand, if an AFM cantilever is too soft (if the force constant is too low) then it might not be stiff enough to indent the investigated material.

Another critical factor is the shape and the size of the AFM tip.

Spheroidal AFM probes might stick to the material, resulting in artefacts, disrupted force–distance curves, or even damaged AFM cantilevers. If the AFM tip is much smaller than the pore size of the hydrogel, it might get stuck in the fibrous network microarchitecture.

On the other hand, if the spherical AFM tip, e.g. as in colloidal AFM probes (a sphere glued to end of a tipless AFM cantilever), is too large, the weight of the sphere can have a negative influence on the spring characteristics of the AFM cantilever.

All these factors and more as described in the cited article have to be carefully weighed before deciding on the settings of the atomic force microscope and choosing an AFM probe for the investigation of a specific hydrogel.

NanoWorld tipless ArrowTL2 cantilever arrays with polystyrene beads glued to them were used by the authors of this beginner’s guide to achieve the AFM data presented in the article.*

Figure 6. from Francisco Drusso Martinez-Garcia et al. 2022: Atomic force microscopy. (A) Equipment. (B) Schematic of an AFM setup with a four-quadrant photodiode (1), in which the four-quadrant photodiode (1) receives a laser (2) reflected from a cantilever (3), in this case positioned over a hydrogel (4) mounted in a piezo stage (5). For example, the height differences in a sample (4) are measured by adjusting the stage using piezo elements (5) to counter the cantilever bending on a nanometer scale. (C) The AFM can then generate a surface heightmap of the hydrogels such as a GelMA hydrogel (shown). AFM can also be used to determine the mechanical properties of hydrogels. (D) Schematic of the AFM technique to determine the elastic moduli of hydrogels with a tipless cantilever (1), spheroidal probe (2, red), hydrogel (3), and stiff substrate (4). As the cantilever represents a spring with a known spring constant, the cantilever bending due to elastic counterforces exerted by the soft material is correlated with the piezo stage height (4). (E) The so-called force–distance curves are recorded. Data from a collagen type-I hydrogel (3.0 g/L) are shown. (F) Young’s moduli of a 1.5 g/L and 3.0 g/L collagen type-I hydrogel. Outliers indicated by ◆. AFM equipment detailed in Appendix A of the cited article. NanoWorld tipless ArrowTL2 cantilever arrays with polystyrene beads glued to them were used by the authors of this beginner’s guide to achieve the AFM data presented in the article. — Figure 6. from Francisco Drusso Martinez-Garcia et al. 2022:
Atomic force microscopy. (A) Equipment. (B) Schematic of an AFM setup with a four-quadrant photodiode (1), in which the four-quadrant photodiode (1) receives a laser (2) reflected from a cantilever (3), in this case positioned over a hydrogel (4) mounted in a piezo stage (5). For example, the height differences in a sample (4) are measured by adjusting the stage using piezo elements (5) to counter the cantilever bending on a nanometer scale. (C) The AFM can then generate a surface heightmap of the hydrogels such as a GelMA hydrogel (shown). AFM can also be used to determine the mechanical properties of hydrogels. (D) Schematic of the AFM technique to determine the elastic moduli of hydrogels with a tipless cantilever (1), spheroidal probe (2, red), hydrogel (3), and stiff substrate (4). As the cantilever represents a spring with a known spring constant, the cantilever bending due to elastic counterforces exerted by the soft material is correlated with the piezo stage height (4). (E) The so-called force–distance curves are recorded. Data from a collagen type-I hydrogel (3.0 g/L) are shown. (F) Young’s moduli of a 1.5 g/L and 3.0 g/L collagen type-I hydrogel. Outliers indicated by ◆. AFM equipment detailed in Appendix A of the cited article.

*Francisco Drusso Martinez-Garcia, Tony Fischer, Alexander Hayn, Claudia Tanja Mierke, Janette Kay Burgess and Martin Conrad Harmsen
A Beginner’s Guide to the Characterization of Hydrogel Microarchitecture for Cellular Applications
Gels 2022, 8(9), 535
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8090535

The article “A Beginner’s Guide to the Characterization of Hydrogel Microarchitecture for Cellular Applications” by Francisco Drusso Martinez-Garcia, Tony Fischer, Alexander Hayn, Claudia Tanja Mierke, Janette Kay Burgess and Martin Conrad Harmsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

MACC1-Induced Collective Migration Is Promoted by Proliferation Rather Than Single Cell Biomechanics

High metastasis-associated in colon cancer 1 (MACC1) expression is associated with metastasis, tumor cell migration, and increased proliferation in colorectal cancer. Tumors with high MACC1 expression show a worse prognosis and higher invasion into neighboring structures. However, the mediation of the pro-migratory effects is still a matter of investigation.*

In their study “MACC1-Induced Collective Migration Is Promoted by Proliferation Rather Than Single Cell Biomechanics” Tim Hohmann, Urszula Hohmann, Mathias Dahlmann, Dennis Kobelt, Ulrike Stein and Faramarz Dehghani aim to elucidate the impact of single cell biomechanics and proliferation on MACC1-dependent migration.*

The authors found that MACC1 expression associated with increased collective migration, caused by increased proliferation, and no changes in single cell biomechanics. Thus, targeting proliferation in high-MACC1-expressing tumors may offer additional effects on cell migration.*

The mechanical properties of single cells were assessed in the form of the Young’s modulus and cortex tension; both were measured using atomic force microscopy. Briefly, cells were seeded on a petri dish and measured 15 min after seeding to avoid slippage of individual cells. Measurements were conducted using a tipless NanoWorld Arrow-TL2 AFM cantilever array to apply a force of 1 nN that led to deformations of 1–2 µm. The Young’s modulus was calculated using the Hertz model.*

Figure 1 from “MACC1-Induced Collective Migration Is Promoted by Proliferation Rather Than Single Cell Biomechanics” by Tim Hohmann et al. Single cell properties of high- and low-MACC1-expressing colon carcinoma cells. (A,B) depict the results of the biomechanical measurements for the Young´s modulus and the cortex tension. (C,D) show the results of live cell imaging of single cells for the mean speed and the contact area with the substrate. Sample sizes: (A) nSW480/EV = 35; nSW480/MACC1 = 33; nSW620/shMACC1 = 40; nSW620/shCTL = 40. (B) nSW480/EV = 33; nSW480/MACC1 = 31; nSW620/shMACC1 = 25; nSW620/shCTL = 26. (C,D) nSW480/EV = 66; nSW480/MACC1 = 98; nSW620/shMACC1 = 102; nSW620/shCTL = 111. Asterisk depicts statistically significant results with p < 0.05. Box plots show the median (red line), 25 and 75 percentile (box), non-outlier range (whiskers), and outliers (red dots). The mechanical properties of single cells were assessed in the form of the Young’s modulus and cortex tension; both were measured using atomic force microscopy. Briefly, cells were seeded on a petri dish and measured 15 min after seeding to avoid slippage of individual cells. Measurements were conducted using a NanoWorld Arrow-TL2 AFM cantilever to apply a force of 1 nN that led to deformations of 1–2 µm. The Young’s modulus was calculated using the Hertz model. — Figure 1 from “MACC1-Induced Collective Migration Is Promoted by Proliferation Rather Than Single Cell Biomechanics” by Tim Hohmann et al.
Single cell properties of high- and low-MACC1-expressing colon carcinoma cells. (A,B) depict the results of the biomechanical measurements for the Young´s modulus and the cortex tension. (C,D) show the results of live cell imaging of single cells for the mean speed and the contact area with the substrate. Sample sizes: (A) nSW480/EV = 35; nSW480/MACC1 = 33; nSW620/shMACC1 = 40; nSW620/shCTL = 40. (B) nSW480/EV = 33; nSW480/MACC1 = 31; nSW620/shMACC1 = 25; nSW620/shCTL = 26. (C,D) nSW480/EV = 66; nSW480/MACC1 = 98; nSW620/shMACC1 = 102; nSW620/shCTL = 111. Asterisk depicts statistically significant results with p < 0.05. Box plots show the median (red line), 25 and 75 percentile (box), non-outlier range (whiskers), and outliers (red dots).

*Tim Hohmann, Urszula Hohmann, Mathias Dahlmann, Dennis Kobelt, Ulrike Stein and Faramarz Dehghani
MACC1-Induced Collective Migration Is Promoted by Proliferation Rather Than Single Cell Biomechanics
Cancers 2022, 14(12), 2857
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14122857

Open Access

The article “MACC1-Induced Collective Migration Is Promoted by Proliferation Rather Than Single Cell Biomechanics” by Tim Hohmann, Urszula Hohmann, Mathias Dahlmann, Dennis Kobelt, Ulrike Stein and Faramarz Dehghani is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.