Author: NanoWorld

Electrically and mechanically driven rotation of polar spirals in a relaxor ferroelectric polymer

Flux-closure structures, vortices/antivortices, skyrmions, and merons in oxides, metals and polymers represent non-trivial topologies in which a local polar/magnetic order undergoes quasi-continuous spatial variations in a host crystal lattice. These structures are now extensively studied due to emergent functionalities, but the application of electrical/mechanical fields has so far only served to destroy the polar topologies of interest. *

Topology created by quasi-continuous spatial variations of a local polarization direction represents an exotic state of matter, but field-driven manipulation has been hitherto limited to creation and destruction. *In the article “Electrically and mechanically driven rotation of polar spirals in a relaxor ferroelectric polymer” Mengfan Guo, Erxiang Xu, Houbing Huang, Changqing Guo, Hetian Chen, Shulin Chen, Shan He, Le Zhou, Jing Ma, Zhonghui Shen, Ben Xu, Di Yi, Peng Gao, Ce-Wen Nan, Neil. D. Mathur and Yang Shen report that relatively small electric or mechanical fields can drive the non-volatile rotation of polar spirals in discretized microregions of the relaxor ferroelectric polymer poly(vinylidene fluoride-ran-trifluoroethylene).*

These polar spirals arise from the asymmetric Coulomb interaction between vertically aligned helical polymer chains, and can be rotated in-plane through various angles with robust retention. *

Given also that their manipulation of topological order can be detected via infrared absorption, Mengfan Guo et al.’s work suggests a new direction for the application of complex materials. *

Mengfan Guo et al. produced a 100-nm-thick monolayer of face-on lamellae with vertically aligned polymer chains by melt-recrystallizing spin-coated thin films of P(VDF-TrFE).

The resulting melt-recrystallized thin film of the relaxor ferroelectric polymer was characterized by the authors using a commercial atomic force microscope for in-plane piezo-response force microscopy (IP-PFM).

NanoWorld Platinum Iridium coated Arrow-CONTPt AFM probes (typical resonant frequency: 14 kHz, typical force constant: 0.2 N/m, typical AFM tip radius 25 nm) were used for the in-plane (IP) PFM tests and the PFM lithography tests.

For piezo-response force microscopy (PFM) imaging, Vector mode was used where AFM tips were modulated at around 240 kHz for IP imaging, with the AC voltage set at 2 V. The images obtained by Vector Mode were double checked by using dual AC resonance tracking (DART) mode and the patterns could be reproduced. *

For angle-resolved IP-PFM tests, the rotation of sample was controlled by a protractor. To ensure identical position was imaged after rotating the sample, the authors made cross-scratches as a mark on the sample surface in advance. This method was applied to locate the scanning position in other situations if Mengfan Guo et al. had to move the sample in between the scanning probe microscopic studies.

For electric-field-induced manipulations using PFM lithography, the DC voltage on AFM tip was previously edited in the software. The scan speed was set at 1.95 Hz and no AC voltage was applied during the scanning. The DC voltage was divided by film thickness (100 nm) to obtain the electric field value. And an electric field with downward direction is defined with a positive sign.

For stress-induced manipulations, the deflection value of the PFM cantilever, which is a signal from photodetector, was preset to control the stress/force applied onto the sample. The difference in deflection value between a pressed AFM cantilever and a free AFM cantilever reflects how hard the AFM tip and sample surface are pressed to each other.*

To obtain the force value F, Mengfan Guo et al. first calibrated the AFM tips by the thermal noise method, and obtain the inverse optical lever sensitivity (InvOLS) and the spring constant k of the AFM tips.

The authors also conducted a polarization analysis based on their PFM measurements. *

To obtain the nominal toroidal order evaluated by the local curvature, the obtained IP-PFM amplitude image was firstly divided into 33 × 33 arrays, and each region was then subjected to a recognition of potential domain walls and measurement of an averaged curvature radius. *

To obtain polarization maps, angle-resolved IP-PFM images were first aligned to correct spatial distortion in nanoscale measurement. Positions with specific morphological characteristics were selected as reference points to determine the coordinate. After the correction, improved angle-resolved IP-PFM phase images would be divided into 64 × 64 arrays for deriving polarization maps. *

Fig. 1 from Mengfan Guo et al. (2024) “Electrically and mechanically driven rotation of polar spirals in a relaxor ferroelectric polymer”:Observation of a microregion containing an in-plane polar spiral. a Morphology of a melt-recrystallized thin film of the relaxor ferroelectric polymer. The scale bar is 2 μm. IP-PFM phase (b) and amplitude (c) images of the same area in a exhibiting concentric ring-shaped domains in curly stripe domains. d Distribution of domain wall curvatures in the same area in a–c evidencing nominal toroidal order. It is assumed that the local polarization is parallel to the nearest domain wall so that larger curvature (denoted red) reflects stronger toroidal order. IP-PFM phase images of identical concentric ring-shaped domains with the axis along vertical (e) and horizontal (f) measurement directions. The scale bar is 0.3 μm. The curl (g) and the divergence (h) of local polarization in the same area as e and f, revealing the polar spiral topology. i Schematic stereoscopic view of a CCW polar spiral, arrows represent regions of polarization. The red/blue arrows denote the polar source/sink that spirals in/out. The white arrows represent Néel rotation along the radial direction, as shown in more detail via the inset. NanoWorld Platinum Iridium coated Arrow-CONTPt AFM probes (typical resonant frequency: 14 kHz, typical force constant: 0.2 N/m, typical AFM tip radius 25 nm) were used for the in-plane (IP) PFM tests and the PFM lithography tests.
Fig. 1 from Mengfan Guo et al. (2024) “Electrically and mechanically driven rotation of polar spirals in a relaxor ferroelectric polymer”:
Observation of a microregion containing an in-plane polar spiral.
a Morphology of a melt-recrystallized thin film of the relaxor ferroelectric polymer. The scale bar is 2 μm. IP-PFM phase (b) and amplitude (c) images of the same area in a exhibiting concentric ring-shaped domains in curly stripe domains. d Distribution of domain wall curvatures in the same area in a–c evidencing nominal toroidal order. It is assumed that the local polarization is parallel to the nearest domain wall so that larger curvature (denoted red) reflects stronger toroidal order. IP-PFM phase images of identical concentric ring-shaped domains with the axis along vertical (e) and horizontal (f) measurement directions. The scale bar is 0.3 μm. The curl (g) and the divergence (h) of local polarization in the same area as e and f, revealing the polar spiral topology. i Schematic stereoscopic view of a CCW polar spiral, arrows represent regions of polarization. The red/blue arrows denote the polar source/sink that spirals in/out. The white arrows represent Néel rotation along the radial direction, as shown in more detail via the inset.

*Mengfan Guo, Erxiang Xu, Houbing Huang, Changqing Guo, Hetian Chen, Shulin Chen, Shan He, Le Zhou, Jing Ma, Zhonghui Shen, Ben Xu, Di Yi, Peng Gao, Ce-Wen Nan, Neil. D. Mathur and Yang Shen
Electrically and mechanically driven rotation of polar spirals in a relaxor ferroelectric polymer
Nature Communications volume 15, Article number: 348 (2024)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44395-5

The article “Electrically and mechanically driven rotation of polar spirals in a relaxor ferroelectric polymer” by Mengfan Guo, Erxiang Xu, Houbing Huang, Changqing Guo, Hetian Chen, Shulin Chen, Shan He, Le Zhou, Jing Ma, Zhonghui Shen, Ben Xu, Di Yi, Peng Gao, Ce-Wen Nan, Neil. D. Mathur and Yang Shen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Interfacial water on collagen nanoribbons by 3D AFM

Collagen is the most abundant structural protein in mammals. *

Type I collagen in its fibril form has a characteristic pattern structure that alternates two regions called gap and overlap. The structure and properties of collagens are highly dependent on the water and mineral content of the environment. *

In the article “Interfacial water on collagen nanoribbons by 3D AFM” Diana M. Arvelo, Clara Garcia-Sacristan, Enrique Chacón, Pedro Tarazona and Ricardo Garcia describe how they apply three dimensional atomic force microscopy (3D AFM) to characterize at angstrom-scale resolution the interfacial water structure of collagen nanoribbons.*

Three-dimensional AFM (3D AFM) is an AFM method developed for imaging at high-spatial resolution solid–liquid interfaces in the three spatial coordinates.*

This method has provided atomic-scale images of hydration and solvation layers on a variety of rigid and atomically flat surfaces, such as mica, gibbsite, boehmite, graphite, or 2D materials.*

However, imaging hydration layers on soft materials such as collagen is more challenging than on atomically flat crystalline surfaces.*

On the one hand, the force applied by the AFM tip might deform the protein. On the other hand, the height variations across gap and overlap regions might complicate the imaging of interfacial water.*

In recent years, 3D AFM has expanded its capabilities to image interfacial water on soft materials such as proteins, biopolymers, DNA, lipids, membrane proteins, and cells.*

Those experiments were performed with hydrophilic SiOx AFM tips which are negatively charged under neutral pH conditions.*

The imaging contrast mechanisms and the role of the AFM tip’s composition on the observed solvation structure are under discussion.*

More generally, both theory and experiments performed with very high salt concentrations indicated that the contrast observed in 3D AFM reflects an interplay between water particle and surface charge density distributions.*

For their article the authors apply 3D AFM to study at molecular-scale spatial resolution the structure of interfacial water on collagen nanoribbons.*

Diana M. Arvelo et al. study the influence of the AFM tip’s charge and the salt concentration on the interfacial solvent structure. They report that the interfacial structure depends on the water particle and ion charge density distributions. A non-charged AFM tip reveals the formation of hydration layers on both gap and overlap regions. A negatively charged AFM tip shows that on a gap region, the solvation structure might depart from that of the hydration layers. This effect is attributed to the adsorption of ions from the solution. Those ions occupy the voids existing between collagen molecules in the gap region. *

A home-made three-dimensional AFM was implemented on a commercially available AFM. 3D AFM was performed in the amplitude modulation mode by exciting the AFM cantilever at its first eigenmode.
At the same time when the AFM cantilever oscillates with respect to its equilibrium position, a sinusoidal signal is applied to the z-piezo to modify the relative z-distance between the sample and the AFM tip. *

Diana M. Arvelo et al. have used z-piezo displacements with amplitudes of 2.0 nm and a period (frequency) of 10 ms (100 Hz). The z-piezo signal is synchronized with the xy-displacements in such a way that for each xy-position on the surface of the material, the AFM tip performs a single and complete z-cycle. The z-data are read out every 10.24 µs and stored in 512 pixels (256 pixels per half cycle). Each xy-plane of the 3D map contains 80 × 64 pixels. Hence, the total time to acquire such a 3D-AFM image is 52 s.*

The 3D AFM experiments were performed with two types of AFM probes with different surface chemistries which have different chemical properties in aqueous solutions.*

The high-density carbon/diamond-like AFM tips grown on quartz-like AFM cantilevers that Diana M. Arvelo et al. et al used ( NanoWorld Ultra-Short Cantilevers USC-F1.2-k7.3 for high-speed AFM) remain uncharged at pH 7.4 and are called “neutral” AFM tips in the article.

The silicon AFM cantilevers with silicon AFM tips (NanoWorld Arrow-UHFAuD ultra-high frequency AFM probes) are negatively charged at neutral pH (silicon tips for short in the text) and were used to observe the formation of collagen nanoribbons.

All silicon AFM tips are readily oxidized and are usually covered by a thin native oxide layer which is hydrophilic.

The hydroxyl groups on the surface of the silicon AFM tip become negatively charged while the carbon AFM tips remain neutral (unchanged).

To image at angstrom-scale resolution, the interfacial water structure on the collagen requires reducing the lateral and vertical imaging sizes, respectively, to 5 and 1.5 nm.*

First, the authors introduce the results obtained with carbon-based tips (uncharged, NanoWorld Ultra-Short Cantilevers USC-F1.2-k7.3 for high-speed AFM). Figure 2 (of the cited article) shows some representative 2D force xz panels obtained on gap and overlap regions of a collagen nanoribbon in a concentration of 300 mM KCl. The panels are extracted from a 3D AFM image. The interlayer distances in a gap region are d1 = 0.28 nm and d2 = 0.33 nm (average values) [Fig. 2(a)], while those in an overlap region are d1 = 0.29 and d2 = 0.32 nm (average values) [Fig. 2(b)]. Those values coincide within the experimental error with the values expected for hydration layers on hydrophilic surfaces.

Next, the authors repeated the experiment using other salt concentrations. Figure 2(c) shows that the interlayers distances (within the experimental error) do not depend on the salt concentration or the collagen region. Diana M. Arvelo et al.  remark that entropic effects make the second layer more disordered than the first; therefore, d2 ≥ d1.

The structure and properties of collagens are highly dependent on the water and mineral content of the environment.

For a neutral AFM tip (USC-F1.2-k7.3), the interfacial water structure is characterized by the oscillation of the water particle density distribution with a value of 0.3 nm (hydration layers). The interfacial structure does not depend on the collagen region.

For a negatively charged AFM tip (NanoWorld Arrow-UHFAuD ultra-high frequency AFM probes) the interfacial structure might depend on the collagen region.

Hydration layers are observed in overlap regions, while in gap regions, the interfacial solvent structure is dominated by electrostatic interactions. These interactions generate interlayer distances of 0.2 nm.

The achieved results still need to be explained by the theory of 3D AFM. More detailed theoretical simulations, which are beyond the scope of the cited study, will be required to quantitatively explain the interlayer distances observed over gap regions.

However, the results presented by the authors highlight the potential of 3D AFM to identify the solvent structures on proteins and the complexity of those interfaces.*

Figure 2 from Diana M. Arvelo et al. 2024 “Interfacial water on collagen nanoribbons by 3D AFM”Interfacial liquid water structure on collagen provided by an uncharged tip. (a) 2D force maps (x, y) of the interfacial water structure in the gap region. The map is obtained in a 300 mM KCl solution. The force–distance curves in the bottom of the image are obtained from the top panel. (b) 2D force maps (x, y) of the interfacial water structure in the overlap region. The force–distance curves in the bottom of the image are obtained from the top panel. (c) Statistics of d1 and d2 distances measured from several collagen–water interfaces. The individual force–distance curves from the bottom panels of (a) and (b) are plotted in gray. The average force–distance curve is highlighted by a thick continuous line. The experiments are performed with USC-F1.2-k7.3 cantilevers. Experimental parameters: f = 745 kHz; k = 6.7 N m−1; Q = 8.3; A0 = 150 pm; Asp = 100 pm. The neutral AFM tips used for the research in this article were NanoWorld Ultra-Short Cantilevers USC-F1.2-k7.3 for high-speed AFM (quartz-like AFM cantilevers with a high-density carbon AFM tip grown on them)
Figure 2 from Diana M. Arvelo et al. 2024 “Interfacial water on collagen nanoribbons by 3D AFM”
Interfacial liquid water structure on collagen provided by an uncharged tip. (a) 2D force maps (x, y) of the interfacial water structure in the gap region. The map is obtained in a 300 mM KCl solution. The force–distance curves in the bottom of the image are obtained from the top panel. (b) 2D force maps (x, y) of the interfacial water structure in the overlap region. The force–distance curves in the bottom of the image are obtained from the top panel. (c) Statistics of d1 and d2 distances measured from several collagen–water interfaces. The individual force–distance curves from the bottom panels of (a) and (b) are plotted in gray. The average force–distance curve is highlighted by a thick continuous line. The experiments are performed with USC-F1.2-k7.3 cantilevers. Experimental parameters: f = 745 kHz; k = 6.7 N m−1; Q = 8.3; A0 = 150 pm; Asp = 100 pm.

 

 

Figure 3 from Diana M. Arvelo et al. 2024 “Interfacial water on collagen nanoribbons by 3D AFM”Interfacial liquid water structure on collagen provided by a negatively charged tip. (a) 2D force maps (x, y) of the interfacial water structure in the gap region. The map is obtained in a 300 mM KCl solution. The force–distance curves in the bottom of the image are obtained from the top panel. (b) 2D force maps (x, y) of the interfacial water structure in the overlap region. The force–distance curves in the bottom of the image are obtained from the top panel. (c) Statistics of d1 and d2 distances measured from several collagen–water interfaces. In the bottom panels of (a) and (b), the individual force–distance curves from the bottom panels of (a) and (b) are plotted in gray. The average force–distance curve is highlighted by a thick continuous line. The images were captured using ArrowUHF AuD cantilevers. Experimental parameters: f = 745 kHz; k = 8.3 N m−1; Q = 4.5; A0 = 170 pm; Asp = 100 pm. The negatively charged AFM tips used for the research in this article were NanoWorld Arrow-UHFAuD ultra-high frequency AFM probes.
Figure 3 from Diana M. Arvelo et al. 2024 “Interfacial water on collagen nanoribbons by 3D AFM”
Interfacial liquid water structure on collagen provided by a negatively charged tip. (a) 2D force maps (x, y) of the interfacial water structure in the gap region. The map is obtained in a 300 mM KCl solution. The force–distance curves in the bottom of the image are obtained from the top panel. (b) 2D force maps (x, y) of the interfacial water structure in the overlap region. The force–distance curves in the bottom of the image are obtained from the top panel. (c) Statistics of d1 and d2 distances measured from several collagen–water interfaces. In the bottom panels of (a) and (b), the individual force–distance curves from the bottom panels of (a) and (b) are plotted in gray. The average force–distance curve is highlighted by a thick continuous line. The images were captured using ArrowUHF AuD cantilevers. Experimental parameters: f = 745 kHz; k = 8.3 N m−1; Q = 4.5; A0 = 170 pm; Asp = 100 pm.

*Diana M. Arvelo, Clara Garcia-Sacristan, Enrique Chacón, Pedro Tarazona and Ricardo Garcia
Interfacial water on collagen nanoribbons by 3D AFM
Journal of Chemical Physics 160, 164714 (2024)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0205611

The article “Interfacial water on collagen nanoribbons by 3D AFM” by Diana M. Arvelo, Clara Garcia-Sacristan, Enrique Chacón, Pedro Tarazona and Ricardo Garcia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.